• Users Online: 17
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-7

Clinico-pathological evaluation of breast cancer in a Nigerian tertiary care center


1 Department of Histopathology, Delta State University, Abraka, Delta State, Nigeria
2 Department of Surgery, Igbinedion University, Okada, Edo State, Nigeria

Date of Submission08-Mar-2022
Date of Decision27-May-2022
Date of Acceptance25-Jun-2022
Date of Web Publication25-Aug-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Obiora Jude Uchendu
Department of Histopathology, Delta State University, Abraka, Delta State
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jmwa.jmwa_6_22

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is a major public health concern globally. In Nigeria, it is the most common cancer in females and is often diagnosed at an advanced stage as an aggressive disease.
OBJECTIVE: The study hopes to assess the clinical and morphologic features of BC specimens in Delta State University Teaching Hospital DELSUTH, Nigeria.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study at the Pathology department of a DELSUTH, from January 1, 2014 to March 30, 2020. The age, gender, laterality, histological diagnosis, tumor grade, and year of diagnosis of these BC were analyzed with Microsoft Excel spreadsheet 2007 and presented in tables and figures.
RESULTS: The study comprised 237 BC patients, accounting for 35.5% of total cancer and consisting of 6 (2.5%) males and 231 (97.5%) females with a mean age of 48.21 years. The age group 30–59 years accounted for 80.2% of the cases. The annual incidence rose to a peak in 2019. Bilateral, right breast, and left breast cancer accounted for 6 (3%), 109 (46%), and 122 (51%) cases respectively. Most cases were invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (89.9%). Well-differentiate (12.2%), moderately differentiated (19.0%) and poorly differentiated (68.8%) cancer accounted for 12.2%, 19% and 68.8% of the cases respectively.
CONCLUSION: BC constitutes a serious growing but poorly addressed health burden affecting mainly Nigerian young and middle-aged women. Most cases are IDC, and Grade III tumors. There is a need to address the gap in prevention, early diagnosis and quality management of BC in developing countries.

Keywords: Breast cancer, carcinoma, grade, laterality, morphology


How to cite this article:
Uchendu OJ, Eboreime OO. Clinico-pathological evaluation of breast cancer in a Nigerian tertiary care center. J Med Womens Assoc Niger 2022;7:1-7

How to cite this URL:
Uchendu OJ, Eboreime OO. Clinico-pathological evaluation of breast cancer in a Nigerian tertiary care center. J Med Womens Assoc Niger [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 29];7:1-7. Available from: http://www.jmwan.org/text.asp?2022/7/1/1/354691


  Introduction Top


Breast cancer (BC) is largely a disease of women with a rare occurrence among men. It is a major public health concern globally, with an estimated 2.1 million newly diagnosed cases, accounting for 11.6%% of all new cancer cases, and 630,000 related deaths, accounting for 6.6% of all cancer deaths, documented in 2018. It is currently the most common cancer among women in most countries with substantial variation from a zenith of 94.2/100,000 population in Australia and New Zealand to a minimum of 25.9/100,000 population in South Central Asian countries.[1]

Although BC is not as common in Nigeria as it is in most developed countries, it remains the most commonly diagnosed cancer among Nigerian women, accounting for about 21.8% of all newly diagnosed cancer cases in this region.[2]

The incidence rate of BC in Nigeria appears to be on the rise, a feature attributed to population growth and aging as well as changing lifestyles. Characteristically the victims are relatively young, with most cases diagnosed at an advanced stage as aggressive disease.[3]

The histopathologist plays a central role in integrated BC care by providing information about the gross specimen, histological stage, grade and diagnosis, hormone receptors expression pattern, and molecular characteristics of BC.[4] This study hopes to assess the epidemiological features of patients with BC and the morphological features of their BC specimens. The study center is the apex hospital of the Delta state where no similar study has been done before.


  Materials and methods Top


Study design

This is a hospital-based descriptive retrospective study.

Setting

The study was conducted in DELSUTH, Nigeria. It is one of the few hospitals with Pathology Service in Delta State.

Study population and sampling strategy

This consists of 237 successive BC specimens (core needle biopsies, excisional biopsies, or mastectomies) submitted for diagnosis to the pathology department of DELSUTH, Nigeria from January 1, 2014 to March 30, 2020. Overall, 446 breast specimens were received during the study period, out of which 237 (53.13%) cases were diagnosed to be BC. These details were extracted from the file copies of the corresponding histopathology reports. Cases with incomplete data or inconclusive diagnoses were excluded from the study.

Data collection

The age, gender, laterality, histological diagnosis, tumor grade and year of diagnosis of these BC cases were accessed for this study. The tumor histologic grading was according to the Nottingham modification of the Scarff-Bloom-Richardson's (SBRs) grading system.[5] In this system, the scoring is based on tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphism and mitotic count, as shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: Modification of the Scarff Bloom and Richardson's grading system

Click here to view


Data analysis

All our observations were tabulated and analyzed using Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet version 2007 and the statistical summary was presented in tables and figures.

Ethical consideration

Ethical approval (reference number HREC/PAN/2019/056/0338) for this study was granted by the hospital committee on ethics before its commencement.


  Results Top


The study incorporated a total of 237 BC patients, comprising 6 (2.5%) males and 231 (97.5%) females. The age range and mean age for the females were 25–81 and 47.93 years respectively while that of the males were 35–84 and 59 years respectively. The mean age for the combined gender is 48.21 years.

The yearly trend of diagnosed BC cases is shown in [Table 2] as 13.1%, 16.9%, 14.8%, 11.8%, 19.4%, 20.3% and 3.8% of the patients were diagnosed in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 respectively.
Table 2: Yearly trend of breast cancer in Delta State University Teaching Hospital

Click here to view


The laterality of BC is depicted in [Figure 1], with BC diagnosed on both breasts, right breast and left breast in 6 (3%), 109 (46%) and 122 (51%) cases respectively.
Figure 1: Laterality of breast cancer. BC: Breast cancer

Click here to view


[Figure 2] shows the age and sex distribution of BC patients. The number of patients within the age groups of 20–29, 30–39, 40–49, 40–59, 60–69, 70–79, and 80–89 years were 2 (0.8%), 66 (27.9%), 60 (25.3%), 64 (27.0%), 34 (14.3%), 9 (3.8%) and 2 (0.8%) respectively. Of the six male BC cases, two cases fell within the age of 40–49 years while four cases occurred singly through the 30–39, 60–69, 70–79 and 80–89 years age-groups respectively.
Figure 2: Age and sex relationship of patients with BC. BC: Breast cancer

Click here to view


The distribution of BC according to the histological types is shown in [Table 3]. All male BC cases were invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) while female BC cases consist of DCIS (2 [0.9%]), IDC of no special type (NST) (207 [89.9%]), lobular carcinoma (4 [1.7%]), mucinous carcinoma (7 [3.0%]), medullary carcinoma (4 [1.7%]), metaplastic carcinoma (4 [1.7%]) and papillary carcinoma (3 [1.3%]).
Table 3: Incidence of histologic types of breast cancer

Click here to view


[Table 4] shows the distribution of BC cases into well differentiated (12.2%), moderately differentiated (19.0%) and poorly differentiated (68.8%) cancer.
Table 4: Histological grading of breast tumor based on modified Scarff Bloom and Richardson's system

Click here to view


[Figure 3] shows classic photographic images of IDC NST, lobular carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, medullary carcinoma and papillary carcinoma, encountered in this study.
Figure 3: The histological variants of BC (×10 magnification). (a) Invasive ductal carcinoma NST. (b) Papillary carcinoma. (c) Mucinous carcinoma. (d): Invasive lobular carcinoma. BC: Breast cancer, NST: No special type

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The study showed that BC is relatively common (35.5% of the total cancers) with an incidence about 38 cases per annum. Although the trend shows striking variation, there seems to be an overall gradual increase from 13.1% of the total cases in 2014 to 20.3% of cases in 2019. This is in line with recent studies that demonstrated increasing incidence of BC in Nigeria.[6],[7]

In this study, BC represents 35.5% of cancers cases in this center. Within the Nigerian cancer space, our report is higher than the 14.1%, 19.4%, 21.0%, 22.4% and 29.0% reported in Kano,[8] Sokoto,[9] Benin City,[10] Ilorin,[11] and Port Harcourt[12] respectively, but lower than 38.0% and 40.9% reported in Lagos[13] and Ogun State,[14] respectively. Report from Ghana showed that BC accounted for 16.0% of all cancer.[15] Reports have also shown that BC is much more common in Europe and America than in our region.[1],[16] It is, however, alarming that in all recent reports in Nigeria, BC has remained the most common of all cancer. Most recent literature agrees that BC incidence in Nigeria is consistently increasing,[6],[7] probably as a result of increasing risk factors such as alcohol use, physical inactivity, obesity, and reproductive factors that increase estrogen exposure such late age at first childbirth, reduction of breastfeeding time, early menarche, late menopause. This underscores the heavy burden of BC among women and by implication, the related mortality and socioeconomic dynamics. This calls for urgent intervention to prevent BC and to mitigate the effect on BC patients and the society at large.

In this study, male BC patients accounted for 2.5% of the cases. Our report is higher than 1.5% and 2.0% in Nnewi[17] and Enugu[18] respectively but lower than 2.8%, 3.0%, 3.7%, 4.0%, 4.6%, 5.2%, 8.6%, and 8.9% in Benin City,[19] Calabar,[6] Maiduguri,[20] Gombe,[2] PortHarcourt,[12] Zaria,[21] Jos,[22] and Osogbo[23] respectively. In a meta-analysis across 22 African countries, male BC accounted for 3.2% of the total BC cases.[24] In India, male BC accounted for about 0.4% of all BC.[25] Among Caucasians, male BC accounts for 2% of all BC cases.[26] The male breast is a rudimentary organ and consists predominantly of fibrous tissue and fat and with scanty poorly-developed ducts and lobules.[26] It has been established that BC occurs predominantly at the level of ducts and lobules which may account for a substantial difference in incidence in both genders.[26] Difference in the endogenous estrogen in males and females may also partly contribute to this disparity. More endogenous estrogen exposure in females implies more cell division and consequently more DNA copying error with consequently increased BC risk among females.[26]

Our study showed that BC is uncommon before the age of 30 years, representing 0.8% of the total cases, which is lower than 3.7% in Benin City,[27] and 10.7% in Kano.[28] Our observation is also lower than 6.4% reported in Tanzania.[29] In US, studies show that BC among women younger than the age of 30 years account for 0.65% of all BC.[30] Rarity of BC below the age of 30 years is however a general observation although it seems than BC below the age of 30 years in more common in African than in Caucasian population.[26] It has however been shown than BC at early age is more likely associated with familial risk factors such as BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 mutations.[3]

We observed a near-flat slope in the age-incidence curve from 30 to 59 years with this age group accounting for about 80% of all cancer cases. This incidence is in line with a comparative review across Africa which showed that BC among this age group accounted for 81% of the cases.[31]

We also observed that 54% of patients were below the age of 50 years. Our observation is equal to the incidence reported in both a hospital-based study in Ile-Ife[3] and a population-based study in Ogun state[14] respectively but lower than 63%, 69%, and 70% reported in Nnewi,[17] Calabar[6] and Ibadan[32] respectively. In Ghana, women younger than 50 years accounted for 50%–61% of BC cases[33] while in Malawi 55% of BC patients were below the age of 50 years.[34]

Another interesting observation is that the mean age for females with BC in our study is 47.9 years. This is intermediate between the mean age of 42.0 years, 44.2 years, 44.9 years, and 45.5 years reported in Kano,[28] Makurdi,[35] Calabar[6] and Port Harcourt[12] respectively and 48.0 and 49.2 years in Ogun State[14] and Ibadan respectively.[32] Similarly, in Ghana case series, the mean ages for BC fell between 33.6 and 50.3 years,[33] while in Malawi, the mean age for BC patients is 48.6 years.[34] An average age of 54.6 years for females with BC was reported in a Meta-analysis across Africa.[24]

In contrast, mean age of 67 years was documented among Caucasian female BC patients, while African-Americans females and Black women in UK presented with BC at a much younger ages of 46 years.[16],[26] The striking difference may be as a result of differences in inheritance of BC genes. It is however not surprising that BC incidence is low after the age of 60 years in our region, given the prevailing young population structure.[36]

In this study, we observed striking gap between the mean age for females and males with BC, with males with BC having a mean age of 59 years. Sahabi and Abdullahi in Kano[37] reported a lower mean age of 49.7 years, while Ezeome et al.[18] in Enugu and Olu-Eddo and Mohoh[19] in Benin city reported a higher mean age of 60.5 and 64.4 years respectively. The disparity in age of presentation may in part be attributed to the late presentation of male BC patients, who are generally unaware of such cancer.

We observed that 97% of the total BC cases were unilateral while the remaining 3% occurred bilaterally. Our observation is lower than the 99.2% observed in both Warri[38] and Benin city,[39] and 99.4% in Gombe,[40] but lower than the 93.4% observed in Lagos.[41] In a study in India, 99% of the BCs were unilateral disease.[42] Bilateral BC can arise either as metastatic disease from a preexisting BC on one breast or an entirely distinct cancer. Where it is a metastatic disease, it may correlate with advanced disease or late presentation.[26],[43] Several reports have confirmed that prognosis of bilateral BC is worse than that of unilateral disease,[43] probably because they are usually advanced diseases.

BC was 5% more common on the left than in the right breast in our report. Our observation was higher than 3.4% difference reported in Warri,[38] but lower than 7.6% and 42.8% difference reported in Benin City[39] and Gombe[40] respectively. In Egypt,[44] South Africa,[45] Pakistan[46] and USA,[47] 7.28%, 10.6%, 18% and 5% excess of left BC were respectively observed. Three hypotheses have been proposed to explain the excess of left BC. Anatomically, the left breast has more tissue than the right breast and this could explain the proportionately more duct-lobular units and therefor higher cancer risk. More females are right handed and are more comfortable to feeding their infants on the right breast. This has protective effect on BC and therefore may reduce cancer risk on the right breast. Thirdly, it is easier to examine the left breast and therefore easier to self-detect left breast lumps or cancer.[45]

Based on the knowledge of the anatomy of the breast, two major cancers can develop from the breast, namely the carcinomas (from the ducts and lobules) and the sarcomas and Phylloides tumors (from the connective tissue stroma). Studies have however shown that almost all BC are adenocarcinoma.[26] All cases in our study were also adenocarcinoma. Some investigators in Nigeria also reported only carcinoma among their BC case series,[14] while in some others, 0.5%–2.3% BC were of varying proportions of sarcomas, malignant phylloides and lymphomas.[38],[40],[48]

In this study, IDC NST was the mostly observed histological variant of BC, accounting for 89.9% of the total BC. This is higher than 59.5%, 68.6%, 70%, 74.9%, 75.0%, 82.8%, 83.5% and 85.3% reported in Kano,[28] Warri,[39] Maiduguri,[48] Benin City,[39] Lagos,[41] Zaria,[21] and Makurdi[35] respectively but lower than 90.1% reported in both PortHarcourt[12] and Uyo.[49] In Tanzania and India, IDC NST accounted for 91.5% and 88% of BC, respectively.[29],[42] In general, IDC NST is the most common histological variant worldwide.[26] In our series, we encountered only five special types, namely lobular, metaplastic, mucinous, medullary and papillary carcinoma.

The prognostic heterogeneity of BC has always fascinated both the clinician and pathologist. The Modified SBR grading system is one of the prognostic parameters utilized in the management of BC, and has been useful in guiding the clinician to his choice of adjuvant systemic therapy. The key elements in this system namely the mitotic rate of the tumor, nuclear size and pleomorphism and the extent of tubule formation are each assigned the score of 1–3, and the final grade generated from summation of these individual scores. Three levels of differentiation are recognized in this grading system namely: well differentiated (Grade I/score 3–5), moderately differentiated (Grade II/score 6–7) and poorly differentiated (Grade III/Score 8–9).[5] In this study, we encountered mostly poorly differentiated BC, which accounted for 69.8% of the cases, while moderately differentiated and well-differentiated BC accounted for 19% and 12.2% of the total cases, respectively. Grade III tumors were also the most common type of BC encountered in both Warri and Port Harcourt.[12],[38] In a review of BC in Ghana, about 50%–76% were Grade II disease, while in Tanzania, over 56.4% were Grade III disease.[29],[33] In India, as high as 80% of BC in referral centers were Grade III disease, while Grade II tumors were more common in private hospital.[50] Strikingly, studies have shown that Black-American women often present with high grade disease, while American and British women often present with disease of lower grades.[16],[51] In a report of comparative analysis of tumor grade in Africa and Finland, Grade III accounted 45.1% and 15.8% of all BC in the respective regions.[52] This is probably the reason for our tumor's highly aggressive disease and consequently have poor prognosis.

Limitations of the study

The study is a hospital-based study and therefore do not capture the overall community incidence. There are also cases of disruption of service during industrial actions and this may affect the significance of this study.


  Conclusion Top


BC accounts for 35.5% of all cancers with rising incidence during the study. It affected 231 (97.5%) females and 6 (2.5%) males, with mean age of 48.2 years and most patients were within 30–59 years. Most cases were IDC, Grade III cancer and were more on the left than the right breast. There is need for a strong political will to fund breast prevention, early diagnosis and management strategies.

Data availability

The raw data used for this study are available at the archives of Pathology department of the institution. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in the submitted article are ours and not an official position of the institution.

Acknowledgement

We would like to appreciate all staff of the Pathology department of DELSUTH for their support in the course of this project, the surgical team of the same hospital for providing the surgical specimens, and Dr. Madueke Chukwudi for processing the photomicrograph images of the various histological variants of BC used in this publication.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Morounke SG, Ayorinde JB, Adu OB, Adedayo FF, Adewale FO, Oluwadamilare I, et al. Epidemiology and incidence of common cancers in Nigeria. J Cancer Biol Res 2017;5:1105.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Titiloye NA, Omoniyi-Esan GO, Adisa AO, Komolafe AO, Afolabi OT, Adelusola KA. Breast cancer in a Nigerian cohort: Histopathology, immunohistochemical profile and survival. Postgrad Med J Ghana 2013;2:83-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Leong AS, Zhuang Z. The changing role of pathology in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. Pathobiology 2011;78:99-114.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: Experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991;19:403-10.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ebughe GA, Ekanem AI, Omoronyia EO, Nnoli MA, Nwagbara VJ, Udosen JE, et al. Age specific incidence of breast cancer in Calabar, Nigeria. IJTDH 2016;16:1-12.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Jedy-Agba E, Curado MP, Ogunbiyi O, Oga E, Fabowale T, Igbinoba F, et al. Cancer incidence in Nigeria: A report from population-based cancer registries. Cancer Epidemiol 2012;36:e271-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Yusuf I, Atanda AT, Umar AB, Imam MI, Mohammed AZ, Ochicha O, et al. Cancer in Kano, Northwestern Nigeria: A 10-year update of the Kano cancer registry. Ann Trop Pathol 2017;8:87-93.  Back to cited text no. 8
  [Full text]  
9.
Sahabi MS, Abdullahi K. Epidemiological survey of malignant neoplasms in Sokoto, Nigeria. WJRR 2017;4:10-5.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Obaseki DE, Forae GD, Okobia M, Ibadin M. Cancer Trends in Benin-City, Nigeria: A Six-Year Report of the Benin Cancer Registry – A Population-Based Analysis (2009–2014). The Benin Cancer Registry (BCR) Report 2015. Uniben Press; 2017. p. 1-60.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Afolanya EA, Ibrahim OO, Ayilara CT. Cancer pattern in Ilorin: An analysis of Ilorin cancer registry statistics. TJHS 2019;9:42-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Obiorah CC, Abu KE. Breast cancer in Rivers State, Nigeria: Ten-year review of the Port Harcourt cancer registry. S Afr J Oncol 2019;3:a58.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Abdulkareem F. Epidemiology and Incidence of Common Cancers in Nigeria. Cancer Registry and Epidemiology Workshop; 2009. p. 11-2. Available from: https://nairametrics.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/EPIDEMILOGY-AND-INCIDENCE-OF-COMMON.pdf. [Last accessed on 2022 Feb 05].  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Okoye OJ, Erinle C, Atulomah NO, Adeleke OK. Epidemiology of female breast cancer in Ogun State: Intra-and inter-regional discuss. UJCM 2017;5:7-13.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ghartey FN Jr., Anyanful A, Eliason S, Mohammed AS, Debrah S. Pattern of breast cancer distribution in Ghana: A survey to enhance early detection, diagnosis, and treatment. Int J Breast Cancer 2016;2016:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Abdulrahman GO Jr., Rahman GA. Epidemiology of breast cancer in Europe and Africa. J Cancer Epidemiol 2012;2012:915610.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Anyanwu SN. Breast cancer in eastern Nigeria a ten year review. West Afr J Med 2000;19:120-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Ezeome ER, Emegoakor CD, Chianakwan GU, Anyanwu S. The pattern of male breast cancer in eastern Nigeria: A 12 year review. Niger Med J 2010;51:26-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
  [Full text]  
19.
Olu-Eddo AN, Momoh MI. Clinicopathological study of male breast cancer in Nigerians and a review of the literature. Nig Q J Hosp Med 2010;20:121-4.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Dogo D, Gali BM, Ali N, Nggada H. Male breast cancer in North Eastern Nigeria, Niger. J Clin Pract 2007;9:139-41.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Yusuf LM, Odigie IV, Mohammed A. Breast masses in Zaria Nigeria. Ann Afr Med 2003;2:13-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Kidmas AT, Ugwu BT, Manasseh AN, Iya D, Opaluwa AS. Male breast malignancy in Jos University Teaching Hospital. West Afr J Med 2005;24:36-40.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Oguntola AS, Aderonmu AO, Adeoti ML, Olatoke SA, Akanbi O, Agodirin SO. Male breast cancer in LAUTECH teaching hospital Osogbo, South Western Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 2009;16:166-70.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Ndom P, Um G, Bell EM, Eloundou A, Hossain NM, Huo D. A meta-analysis of male breast cancer in Africa. Breast 2012;21:237-41.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Chikaraddi SB, Krishnappa R, Deshmane V. Male breast cancer in Indian patients: Is it the same? Indian J Cancer 2012;49:272-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
26.
Lester SC. The breast. In: Kuma V, Abbas AK, Aster JC, editors. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier-Saunders; 2015. p. 1043-71.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Ohanaka CE. Breast cancer in young Nigerian women. Niger J Surg Sci 2007;17:86-90.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Ibrahim IM, Iliyasu Y, Mohammed AZ. Histopathological review of breast tumors in Kano, Northern Nigeria. Sub Saharan Afr J Med 2015;2:47-51.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Rambau PF, Chalya PL, Manyama MM, Jackson KJ. Pathological features of breast cancer seen in Northwestern Tanzania: A nine years retrospective study. BMC Res Notes 2011;4:214.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Anders CK, Johnson R, Litton J, Phillips M, Bleyere A. Breast cancer before age 40 years. Semin Oncol 2009;36:237-49.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Adeloye D, Sowunmi OY, Jacobs W, David RA, Adeosun AA, Amuta AO, et al. Estimating the incidence of breast cancer in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health 2018;8:010419.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Ihekwaba FN. Breast cancer in Nigerian women at the university college hospital, Ibadan. Br J Surg 1992;79:771-5.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Edmund DM, Naaeder SB, Tettey Y, Gyasi RK. Breast cancer in Ghanaian women: What has changed? Am J Clin Pathol 2013;140:97-102.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Kohler RE, Moses A, Krysiak R, Liomba NG, Gopal S. Pathologically confirmed breast cancer in Malawi: A descriptive study: Clinical profile of breast cancer. Malawi Med J 2015;27:10-2.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Vhriterhire AR. Ngbea AJ, Akpor OI, Ojo BA, and Eke BA. Breast cancer histological pattern in Makurdi, Nigeria. J Res Basic Clin Sci 2019;1:297-302.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Danjin M, Toyin MK, Tolulope ED. A systematic review of life expectancy differences and the disease cycle as a major predictor in Africa: The Nigeria Scenarios. Open Access J Nurs 2018;1:89-96.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Sahabi SM, Abdullahi K. Histopathological review of male breast cancer in Sokoto, Nigeria. Ann Trop Pathol 2017;8:108-11.  Back to cited text no. 37
  [Full text]  
38.
Forae GD, Nwachokor FN, Igbe AP. Histopathological profile of breast cancer in an African population. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2014;4:369-73.  Back to cited text no. 38
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
39.
Ekanem VJ, Aligbe JU. Histopathological types of breast cancer in Nigerian women: A 12-year review (1993-2004). Afr J Reprod Health 2006;10:71-5.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Dauda AM, Misauno AM, Ojo EO. Histopathological type of breast cancers in Gombe Northeastern Nigeria, a seven-year review. Afr J Reprod Health 2011;5:107-9.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Olatunji T, Sowunmi AC, Ketiku KK, Campbell OB. Sociodemographic correlates and management of breast cancer in Radiotherapy Department, Lagos University Teaching Hospital: A 10-year review. J Clin Sci 2019;16:111-9.  Back to cited text no. 41
  [Full text]  
42.
Saxena S, Rekhi B, Bansal A, Bagga A, Chintamani A, Murthy NS. Clinico-morphological patterns of breast cancer including family history in a New Delhi hospital, India – A cross-sectional study. World J Surg Oncol 2005;3:67.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Gong SJ, Rha SY, Jeung HC, Roh JK, Yang WI, Chung HC. Bilateral breast cancer: Differential diagnosis using histological and biological parameters. Japanese J Clin Oncol 2007;37:487-92.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Zeeneldin AA, Ramadan M, Elmashad N, Fakhr I, Diaa A, Mosaad E. Breast cancer laterality among Egyptian patients and its association with treatments and survival. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2013;25:199-207.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Mokone-Fatunla DH, Koto MZ, Becker JH, Bondo M, Mundawarara S. Laterality of breast cancer at Dr George Mukhari Academic Hospital. S Afr J Surg 2019;57:56.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Fatima N, Zaman MU, Maqbool A, Khan SH, Riaz N. Lower incidence but more aggressive behavior of right sided breast cancer in Pakistan women. Does right deserve more respect? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:43-5.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Perkins CL, Hotes J, Kohler BA, Howe HL. Association between breast cancer laterality and tumor location, United States, 1994-1998. Cancer Causes Control 2004;15:637-45.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Nggada HA, Gali BM, Bakari AA, Yawe-Terna EH, Tahir MB, Apari E, et al. The spectrum of female breast diseases among Nigerian population in Sahel climatic zone. J Med Med Sci 2011;2:1157-61.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Nwafor CC, Udo AI. Histological characteristics of breast lesions in Uyo, Nigeria. Niger J Surg 2018;24:76-81.  Back to cited text no. 49
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
50.
Shet T, Chinoy CF, Members of Bombay Breast Group. Conference Proceedings Third Update of Breast Diseases; Spectrum of Breast Pathology – A Project across 10 Institutes in Mumbai; 1998. p. 52-60.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Mremi A, Broadwater G, Jackson K, Amsi P, Mbulwa C, Hyslop T, et al. Breast cancer in Tanzanian, black American, and white American women: An assessment of prognostic and predictive features, including tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. PLoS One 2019;14:e0224760.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Ikpatt OF, Kronqvist P, Kuopio T, Ndoma-Egba R, Collan Y. Histopathology of breast cancer in different populations: Comparative analysis for Finland and Africa. Electron J Pathol Histol 2002;8:24011-8.  Back to cited text no. 52
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed670    
    Printed82    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded83    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]