• Users Online: 30
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 21-25

Pattern of refractive errors amongst children attending a new teaching hospital in Kaduna, Nigeria: A 2-year review


Department of Ophthalmology, Barrau Dikko Teaching Hospital, Kaduna State University, Kaduna, Nigeria

Date of Submission27-Jun-2022
Date of Acceptance12-Jul-2022
Date of Web Publication25-Aug-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Stanley Bulus Sano
Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Kaduna State University, Kaduna
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jmwa.jmwa_10_22

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and pattern of presentation of refractive errors (REs) amongst children 5–16 years who attended the eye clinic of a tertiary hospital over a 2-year period.
SETTING: The outpatient unit of the Department of Ophthalmology, Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A descriptive retrospective study of children aged 5–16 years, who presented to our facility between January 2017 and December 2018 with various ocular complaints. Those with presenting visual acuity <6/9 were included in the study. Demographic data were retrieved from patient records. The visual acuity, ocular complaints, RE, general ocular examination and prior history of spectacles use were also extracted from the records. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS version 18.
RESULTS: A total number of 14,004 patients of all ages where seen in outpatients Department of Ophthalmology Clinic. Five thousand six hundred and nine were children aged 5–16 years. Seven per cent of the patients (392) had REs, while 93% (5217) had no RE. The mean age was 10.7 years and with a male-to-female ratio of 1.2:1. Two hundred and thirty patients were in the 11–16 years (58.6%), while 162 (41.4%) belonged to the 5–10 years age group. Myopia accounted for 212 (54%), while mixed astigmatism only 9 (2%). Hyperopia 100 (27%), simple myopic astigmatism 40 (10%), compound myopic astigmatism 18 (4%) and compound hyperopic astigmatism 13 (3%) made up the other REs. Asthenopic symptoms accounted for 78% of all presenting ocular symptoms and were common amongst those with myopia and astigmatism, while 22% had no symptoms. Most of the REs were of mild-to-moderate grade based on their spherical equivalent.
CONCLUSION: RE was identified as a problem amongst children 5–16 years with myopia more common. Most cases of RE in this study were myopia and associated with ocular complaints which were mostly asthenopic symptoms. The majority of the REs were mild to moderate.

Keywords: Asthenopic symptoms, children, Kaduna, refractive error, uncorrected refractive error, visual acuity


How to cite this article:
Sano SB, Diyale SP, Silas BA, Zakiya M. Pattern of refractive errors amongst children attending a new teaching hospital in Kaduna, Nigeria: A 2-year review. J Med Womens Assoc Niger 2022;7:21-5

How to cite this URL:
Sano SB, Diyale SP, Silas BA, Zakiya M. Pattern of refractive errors amongst children attending a new teaching hospital in Kaduna, Nigeria: A 2-year review. J Med Womens Assoc Niger [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 29];7:21-5. Available from: http://www.jmwan.org/text.asp?2022/7/1/21/354689


  Introduction Top


Refractive error (RE), a common childhood problem, is a major cause of visual impairment (VI) and also the second major cause of treatable blindness worldwide.[1]

Globally, it is estimated that about 19 million children are visually impaired, with about 12 million being blind from uncorrected refractive error (URE). The majority of these children are in the 5–15 years age group.[2],[3] URE has been recognised as a public health challenge in many countries including Nigeria.[4],[5],[6],[7],[8] URE negatively impacts on developmental milestones, education, job opportunities and eventually, the quality of life.[9],[10] Therefore, there is a need for early detection and treatment of REs in children.[8]

Blindness from URE in a country suggests poor access to eye care services as the provision of spectacles is an easy, affordable and effective eye care service.[11] Various patterns of RE have been identified across different parts of the world.[8],[12],[13] Children with RE may present with various ocular-related complaints depending on the type and extent.

This study aims to assess the prevalence and pattern of RE amongst children aged 5–16 years who attended our facility during the study period. We also intend to identify the presenting complaints, distribution and the degree of REs amongst the study population. Information obtained from this study will be useful for planning public health services and advocacy to address the burden of URE amongst children in Kaduna state and serve as a basis for state policy on school eye health programmes.


  Subjects and Methods Top


This is a hospital-based descriptive retrospective study of children aged 5–16 years who were seen at the outpatient unit of the Ophthalmology Department, Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria, between January 2017 and December 2018. Patients with visual acuity (VA) <6/9 and requiring ± 0.5 dioptre sphere (Ds) or cylinder (Dcyl) of correction to see at least 2 or more lines better than presenting visual acuity (PVA) were included in the study, while those with other ocular pathologies along with incomplete information in their records were excluded from the study. Patient's demographic information such as age, sex, ethnic group and educational level was also retrieved and recorded. Other information recorded included presenting complaints, PVA aided and unaided and refraction results along with the prior history of use of spectacles.

The following definitions similar to that of another study[9] were used:

Normal vision = PVA ≥ 6/9

Mild visual impairment = PVA < 6/9 to ≥ 6/18

Moderate visual impairment = PVA < 6/18 to ≥ 6/60

Severe visual impairment = PVA < 6/60 to ≥ 3/60

Blindness = PVA < 3/60

Low myopia = <−0.5 to − 1.00 Ds

Moderate myopia = ≥−1.25 to <−5.00 Ds.

High myopia = ≥−5.00 to − 10.0 Ds.

Extreme myopia = >10.00 Ds.

Low hypermetropia = +0.5 to <+1.00 Ds.

Moderate hypermetropia = +1.25Ds to + 5.00Ds.

High hypermetropia = >+5.00 to + 10.00Ds.

Extreme hypermetropia = >+10.00Ds.

Low astigmatism = >−0.25 to − 0.75Dcyl

Moderate astigmatism = −1.00 to − 2.75Dcyl

High astigmatism = −3.00Dcyl and above

Ethical clearance was given by the Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital Ethical Committee on Research and Helsinki Declaration was duly followed. Data analysis was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 18 (SPSS Inc Chicago IL, USA). Chi-square test and t-test were used to calculate differences between percentages and means, respectively, P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria, is a 240-bed capacity hospital recently upgraded from the status of a specialist to a teaching hospital. It is the apex of health care delivery by Kaduna state government and attends to patients from within Kaduna and the neighbouring states of Niger, Katsina, Kano and Nasarawa. The hospital offers services in various specialities including ophthalmology. The Ophthalmology Department offers various clinical, surgical and refraction services including dispensing of spectacles.


  Results Top


Prevalence of refractive error

A total of 14,004 people were seen at the ophthalmology outpatient unit of Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital, Kaduna, Nigeria, between January 2017 and December 2018 for various ocular problems. Of this number, 5209 (40%) were children aged 5–16 years from which 392 (7%) had RE [Figure 1]. Males were 210 (53.6%), while females were 182 (46.4%) with a male-to-female ratio of 1.2:1 and a mean age of 10.7 ± 2.2 years.
Figure 1: Clinic attendance

Click here to view


Age distribution of refractive error

More people in the age group of 11–16 years had RE representing 58.7% (230), while the age group of 5–10 years had 41.3% (162) participants [Figure 2]. Males in the age group 14–16 years (36%) had more RE in contrast to females with RE who were more in the 11–13 years age group (30.1%).
Figure 2: Age distribution of refractive errors

Click here to view


Sex distribution of refractive error

A total of 206 (52.6%) of the study population were males, while 47.4% (186) were females [Table 1].
Table 1: Sex distribution of refractive errors

Click here to view


Presenting complaints

About 79.3% of complaints were those associated with asthenopia, 13.8% complaints were of difficulty reading prints while 6.9% had no symptoms [Table 2].
Table 2: Presenting complaints

Click here to view


Spectacle use

Spectacle use does not seem to be popular amongst our students as only 11 (2.8%) of the students were recorded to be using glasses during the study period.

Distribution of types of refractive errors

In this study [Table 3] and [Table 4], myopia accounted for 212 (54%) of RE, while mixed astigmatism was the least with 9 (2.3%).
Table 3: Distribution of types of refractive errors

Click here to view
Table 4: Refractive error based on spherical equivalent

Click here to view


Majority (63.3%) of those with RE based on spherical equivalent had mild RE with only 6.6% having high RE [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Degree of refractive errors based on spherical equivalent

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Prevalence of refractive errors

The prevalence of RE in this study was 7%. Most hospital-based studies in Nigeria reported a higher frequency of RE amongst the paediatric age groups.[14],[15],[16] The reason for the disparity in results within Nigeria is not clear, but this may not be unconnected with the difference in methodology, case definition an d bias associated with hospital-based studies. RE may also be associated with difference in its geographical distributions. It is apparent that RE is a common presentation amongst children in most eye clinics across Nigeria. A study in Ghana found the prevalence of RE similar to that of our study.[17] Studies in China and amongst Chinese residents in the United States of America revealed prevalence as high as 27.0% and 37.2%, respectively,[18],[19] while a study in Nepal found a prevalence as low as 2.9%.[20] Racial background has been found to play an important role in determining the prevalence of RE.[19]

Age of distribution

About half of the patients, 230 (58.7%) were aged 11–16 years, this finding is similar to other findings in Nigeria and other parts of the world.[14],[15],[16],[20],[21] It has been attributed to the refractive changes of the eye that occurs between the age of 11–16 years which is as a result of increased axial length of the globe. At this age, children are able to identify and explain visual symptoms better,[5] and the visual demands at school during this period also exaggerate visual needs. Since most of the patients presented at an older age, it only highlights the inadequacy of early screening and oversight of parents to the visual challenges of their children. Late presentation of RE for treatment may not be successful because of the risk of the development of amblyopia, especially in cases of high RE or coexisting ocular abnormalities. All children need to be screened for RE on entry to school and yearly afterwards till completion of primary school. VA of 6/6 does not guarantee visual health, besides, testing VA alone in screening programmes is not conclusive as VA is not only visual sharpness but also the quality of vision as there may be aberrations or low contrast sensitivity.[22]

Sex distribution of refractive error

The gender distribution of RE in this study shows that 207 (52.6%) participants were male and 186 (47.4%) of the participants were female, this is in contrast to other hospital-based studies across Nigeria[5],[14],[15],[16] and Asia[20],[21] where more females presented with RE because they tend to report more readily than boys because it has been suggested that girls tend to read more than boys,[5] while others have suggested early pubertal changes in girls to be the reason.[23] The reason for the higher prevalence of males in this study may not be unconnected with the bias associated with hospital-based studies, besides most females in the northern part of Nigeria are under strict religious laws to avoid going to public places unaccompanied by relatives.

Presenting complaints

Some patients with RE may not complain of any ocular symptoms but many of those presenting to the hospital with RE come because of one complain or the other. In this study, asthenopic symptoms were the predominant complaints amongst 233 (58.9%) of the participants. This is similar to the findings in Brazil by Schellini et al.[24] who identified asthenopic symptoms and poor distant vision to be the major symptoms. Kuswanto et al.[25] in a study in Indonesia amongst primary school-age pupils found asthenopia to be highly associated with REs, especially myopia and astigmatism. Our study also revealed that 27 (6.9%) of people had no visual complaints. It is believed that symptoms are more frequent with females because they are more likely to report symptoms.

Spectacle use

Spectacles have been identified to be cost-effective in correcting RE across the world,[26] however, only 11 (2.8%) of children who needed spectacles in our study had a history of prior use despite presenting at an average age of 10.7 years. This is similar to the findings by Olusanya et al.[15] in southwest Nigeria and other studies in Asia and America.[20],[27],[28] Reasons ascribed to this include societal myths, paucity of RE services and lack of awareness of guardians and parents. The cost of spectacles may also be an important factor in developing countries.

Distribution of the types of refractive errors

Myopia accounted for 212 (54%) of the study population, while mixed astigmatism was the least with only 9 (2%) of the children with RE. Olusanya et al.[15] in the southwest and Opubiri et al.[16] in south-south Nigeria also found myopia to be the most common RE in their studies, however, some other studies across Nigeria found astigmatism to be more common,[4],[14],[29] and another within Nigeria[8] found hyperopia to be the most common. Various studies across the world have documented various RE patterns.[17],[20],[30] The difference in the RE types in studies within Nigeria and across the world may be explained by the difference in the case definition and methodology of the studies. Pan et al.[19] confirmed differences across the racial distribution of RE in a population in the United States.


  Conclusion Top


REs are a major reason for the presentation of children aged 5–16 years to the eye clinic. This study found RE to be responsible for 7% of presentations at the outpatient unit of our department in this age group with male affectation being the more predominant. Myopia was the major RE accounting for 54% of all REs, while asthenopia was the most common symptom, especially in myope and astigmatic, and was mostly of the mild-to-moderate grade.

Limitation of the study

This study used VA of 6/9 as a basis for testing RE which limited the accuracy of the results. It has been reported that as many as 10% of hyperopia and 6.6% of those with astigmatism may be missed even if screening is based on the use of VA of 6/6. Therefore, it is believed that many students in this study with RE might have been missed because of the use of VA <6/9 as a basis for screening for RE, thereby reducing the actual prevalence of RE. VA <6/9 was used for convenience only.

Recommendation

We recommend early visual screening of children (pre-school) for REs because of the effects of amblyopia in later life. All children irrespective of their presenting VA should be screened for RE. Parents, guardians and teachers should be involved in close monitoring of these children to identify these REs early as many will not complain of symptoms. Sensitisation at public places on the need for early ocular screening for RE should be encouraged while screening for RE should be made mandatory on entering primary school and subsequently yearly till completion of primary school. It is also hoped that the result will serve as a template for policymakers in health care and related agencies in tackling childhood REs.

Acknowledgement

I wish to appreciate the staff, especially the Optometrist and Nurses with the Department of Ophthalmology, Barau Dikko Teaching Hospital for their invaluable assistance in the course of this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Dandona R, Dandona L. Refractive error blindness. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:237-43.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
World Health Organization Global Data on Visual Impairment. Available from: http://WWW.WHO.int/blindnessGLOBALDATAFINALforwebpdf?ua=/fs282/en/2010. [Last accessed on 2020 Mar 16].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Zhao J, Mao J, Luo R, Li F, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB. Accuracy of noncycloplegic autorefraction in school-age children in China. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:49-55.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Michaeline I, Sheriff A, Bimbo A. Paediatric refractive errors in an eye clinic in Osogbo, Nigeria. Ethiop J Health Sci 2016;26:145-52.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Onakpoya OH, Adeoye AO. Childhood eye diseases in southwestern Nigeria: A tertiary hospital study. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2009;64:947-52.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Abah ER, Oladigbolu KK, Samaila E, Gani-Ikilama A. Ocular disorders in children in Zaria children's school. Niger J Clin Pract 2011;14:473-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
7.
Adio AO, Alikor A, Awoyesuku E. Survey of pediatric ophthalmic diagnoses in a teaching hospital in Nigeria. Niger J Med 2011;20:105-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Faderin MA, Ajaiyeoba AJ. Refractive errors in primary school children in Nigeria. Niger J Ophthalmol 2001;9:10-4.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Pokharel GP, Negrel AD, Munoz SR, Ellwein LB. Refractive error study in children: Results from Mechi Zone, Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:436-44.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Naidoo K, Govender P, Holden B. The uncorrected refractive error challenge. Community Eye Health 2014;27:74-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Naidoo KS, Jaggernath J. Uncorrected refractive errors. Indian J Ophthalmol 2012;60:432-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
  [Full text]  
12.
Xiao X, Liu WM, Ye YJ, Huang JZ, Luo WQ, Liu HT, et al. Prevalence of high astigmatism in children aged 3 to 6 years in Guangxi, China. Optom Vis Sci 2014;91:390-6.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Adhikari S, Nepal BP, Shrestha JK, Khandekar R. Magnitude and determinants of refractive error among school children of two districts of Kathmandu, Nepal. Oman J Ophthalmol 2013;6:175-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
14.
Lawan A, Eme O. Pattern of childhood refractive errors in Kano, Nigeria. Borno Med J 2018;5:1-3.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Olusanya BA, Ugalahi MO, Ogunleye OT, Baiyeroju AM. Refractive errors among children attending a tertiary eye facility in Ibadan, Nigeria: Highlighting the need for school eye health programs. Ann Ib Postgrad Med 2019;17:49-59.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Opubiri I, Adio A, Megbelayin E. Refractive error pattern of children south-south Nigeria: A tertiary hospital study. Sky J Med Sci 2013;1:10-4.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Ntim-Amponsah CT, Ofosu-Amaah S. Prevalence of refractive error and other eye diseases in schoolchildren in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2007;44:294-7.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
He M, Huang W, Zheng Y, Huang L, Ellwein LB. Refractive error and visual impairment in school children in rural southern China. Ophthalmology 2007;114:374-82.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Pan CW, Klein BE, Cotch MF, Shrager S, Klein R, Folsom A, et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of refractive errors in the United States: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;155:1129-38.e1.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Rai S, Thapa HB, Sharma MK, Dhakhwa K, Karki R. The distribution of refractive errors among children attending Lumbini Eye Institute, Nepal. Nepal J Ophthalmol 2012;4:90-5.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Biswas J, Saha I, Das D, Bandyopadhyay S, Ray B, Biswas G. Ocular morbidity among children at a tertiary eye care hospital in Kolkata, West Bengal. Indian J Public Health 2012;56:293-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
22.
Villegas EA, Alcón E, Artal P. Optical quality of the eye in subjects with normal and excellent visual acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:4688-96.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Czepita D, Mojsa A, Ustianowska M, Czepita M, Lachowicz E. Role of gender in the occurrence of refractive errors. Ann Acad Med Stetin 2007;53:5-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Schellini S, Ferraz F, Opromolla P, Oliveira L, Padovani C. Main visual symptoms associated to refractive errors and spectacle need in a Brazilian population. Int J Ophthalmol 2016;9:1657-62.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Kuswanto V, Kurninwan F, Shinta AD. Association between refractive error types and asthenopia in primary school students. Majalah Kedokteran Bandung 2021;53:126-31.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Parikshit G, Clare G. Blindness in children: A worldwide perspective. Community Eye Health 2007;20:32-3.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Maul E, Barroso S, Munoz SR, Sperduto RD, Ellwein LB. Refractive error study in children: Results from La Florida, Chile. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:445-54.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Harvey EM, Dobson V, Miller JM. Prevalence of high astigmatism, eyeglass wear, and poor visual acuity among Native American grade school children. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:206-12.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Nwosu SN, Alozie IU. Refractive errors in school children in Onitsha, Nigeria. Niger J Health Biomed Sci 2006;5:114-7.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Li L, Ma Y, Hu X. A research of infant refraction in Kunming Municipality. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2001;37:24-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed534    
    Printed66    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded53    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]